Tuesday, January 29, 2008

TWA Flight 800 coverup

TWA Flight 800.  Some good websites on the incident which Clinton aide George Stephanopoulus once referred to as the “Bombing of TWA flight 800″. 

The Associated Retired Aviation Professionals was formed in early 1997.  Its members include former military, civilian, and aviation professionals who are committed to independently investigating the mysterious crash of TWA Flight 800 on July 17, 1996.


Introduction

CDR. William S. Donaldson, USN (ret.),  challenged the official NTSB position on the cause of the crash of TWA Flight 800 in a series of letters to James Hall, Chairman of the NTSB between April 1997 and December 2000.  During those four years, CDR. Donaldson worked with other Retired Aviation Professionals, including some previous crash investigators as well as persons inside the NTSB investigation itself.  CDR. Donaldson has extensive experience as a Naval crash investigator and he and others concluded that the NTSB’s explanation of the Center Wing Tank explosion was not credible.  With the help of these other concerned aviation professionals, CDR. Donaldson produced an extensive report on the cause of the crash.  The initial Interim Report was delivered to the House Aviation Subcommittee on July 16th, 1998. Since that time a great deal of new information has surfaced.

Information uncovered in early 1999 now shows that TWA Flight 800 could have been shot down by one or more shoulder-fired missiles. The FBI was briefed by military missile experts in the Fall of 1996 that Flight 800 was well within the range of a shoulder fired missile.  The FBI conducted a covert dredging operation for stinger missile parts between November 1996 and April 1997.  CDR. Donaldson brought this new evidence to the House Aviation Subcommittee in testimony on May 6, 1999.  Unfortunately, the major media and the Congress are content to swallow the official line without question.

 

What Really Happened.com

The Associated Retired Aviation Professionals   This is the best website on this subject.


Posted by Jimmy B in 15:40:02 | Permalink | No Comments »

Reasons To Invade Iraq

1. Saddam sparked 3 major regional conflicts in an area that is very important to the United States and the rest of the Western World- Like it or not , we need reasonably priced oil- what happens there effects us here- GET OVER IT !!

2. Saddam had the IIS (Iraqi Intelligence Service) attempt to assassinate an ex-president, GWB Sr in Kuwaitt 1993, Bill Clinton fired cruise missiles into IIS headquarters in retaliation.

3. Saddam Thumbed his nose at the UN for over 12 years- Ignoring the articles imposed on him to end the first Persian Gulf War.(After the discovery of the Oil For Food Scam between Saddam,the UN, & others ,we knew why it was allowed to go on so long) He fired at our planes enforcing the no fly zones as well. Why did we have No-Fly Zones ? To protect the Shiites in the South and Kurds in the North who rebelled against the Tyrant and were now facing his wrath after the Persian Gulf War.

4. Saddam had a well known WMD program and government with cute names like “Dr Germ” and “Chemical Ali”. He was a cold blooded killer who used WMDs numerous times gassing 10’s of thousand men,women, AND CHILDREN !! He had demonstrated his willingness to use them.

5. Saddam’s impedment of UN Weapon Inspectors- What was he hiding & moving? - Led to Desert Fox and the missile attack on Iraq.

December 8 1998– Chief U.N. weapons inspector Richard Butler reports that Iraq is still impeding inspections. U.N. teams begin departing Iraq.

December 15 — A formal U.N. report accuses Iraq of a repeated pattern of obstructing weapons inspections by not allowing access to records and inspections sites, and by moving equipment records and equipment from one to site another.

6. Terrorists lived in Iraq as refuge. Shortly after the invasion Abu Abbas (responsible for the Achille Lauro hijacking among other terror acts) was captured outside of Bahgdad.

“One of our key objectives is to search for, capture and drive out terrorists who have found safe haven in Iraq,” Central Command said in a statement. “The capture of Abu Abbas in Iraq removes a portion of the terror network supported by Iraq and represents yet another victory in the global war on terrorism.”
7. World intel showed that Saddam had WMD’s & was looking to restart his WMD program. After 9/11 all bets were off, no more pussyfooting around. As it turns out now Saddam states he exaggerated claims, gave the perception of having an active WMD program, and planned to renew his WMD program because the worst he feared was another missile strike. He took a gamble and lost. Living in a hole like the rat he was, hung from the gallows for his crimes against the Iraqi people.

Saddam was a tyrant who was a student of Stalin and Hitler. He used their tried and proven methods of torture, repression, and mass murder to keep his thrown and try to expand his empire. Besides Kuwaitt he wanted Saudi Arabia,Iran, and other- control of the oil. He viewed himself as the uniter and conquorer of the Middle East. He had to go. Good riddence. Tactically a good move. We are winning, get over it.

Posted by Jimmy B in 14:51:12 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Monday, January 28, 2008

Saddam Trained Terrorists

We all know that Saddam funded terror and even provided cash to the family of suicide bombers and other dead martyrs but did you know that Saddam also trained terrorists from not just Iraq but from all over the Middle East- many with ties to Al Qaeda. 
According to former UN inspectors, Salman Pak was once and could be the site of probable BW research. The facility also includes, according to defectors, a terrorism training facility where they train on this civilian airliner. The entire facility sits in an ox bow of the Tigris River, 25 km south of Baghdad. This series of shots gradually gets closer to the plane’s fuselage, located at the southern (bottom) part of the facility, above the bend in the river. IKONOS travels 423 miles above the earth’s surface at a speed of 17,500mph, but it’s done a better job of pointing this out than the UN Inspectors who saw it on the ground 
Here are some photo’s of the camp

This interview is with a former Iraqi Captain. While I don’t agree with his assessment that Saddam was behind the 9/11 attacks, it is very plausible that some of the terrorists involved may have received training at this location.  Saddam had many reasons to hate America and providing funding to Al Qaeda for the attacks is well within the realm of plausibility.

Interview With Sabah Khodada from PBS Frontline

After your service in the army, you worked for a secret part of the Iraqi government?

Some of it is not very secretive. But there’s another part, which has a lot to do with international terrorism and this kind of operation — this is very secretive.

Maybe you could tell me what this section is called, and who runs it. And what did it do?

It’s called the Division of Special Operations. … This whole camp where their training is run by the Iraqi [security service]… The government organization [that] basically possesses or have control of the camp is the Iraqi intelligence. But different training people who come, they are headed or sent by different people in the Iraqi government.

You say that this is a secret camp. But what was it like? Was it something you drove by and could see on the highway? Did you need special clearance to go there? How would you describe this place, this location?

If you’re driving on those farm roads, you could probably see the edges of the camp, but you wouldn’t realize this is a special camp. The camp is huge. And the locations for the training are far from anybody can see them from the outside. But even when we have visitors, even at the level of a minister, or even higher than a minister in the Iraqi government, they will have to drive around the camp or be driven in the camp inside very specific type of a vehicle. They will sit on the back seat, for example, of this vehicle and they would have … in addition to the shaded windows, they will have to pull down curtains and they snap those curtains on the bottom, to make sure nobody can see anything outside this vehicle while they’re driven around.

This is even government officials [who] are not allowed to see this kind of training?

Yes. At the very highest level, they cannot see this training.

What kind of training went on, and who was being trained?

Training is majorly on terrorism. They would be trained on assassinations, kidnapping, hijacking of airplanes, hijacking of buses, public buses, hijacking of trains and all other kinds of operations related to terrorism.

The people being trained were Iraqis in one group, and non-Iraqis, or foreign nationals, in another?

Non-Iraqis were trained separately from us. There were strict orders not to meet with them and not to talk to them. And even when they conduct their training, their training has to occur at times different from the times when we conduct the Iraqis our own training.



So you were training Iraqis, Saddam’s fedayeen, members of the militia in Iraq. And someone else, other groups, were training the non-Iraqis?

They were special trainers or teachers from the Iraqi intelligence and al-Mukhabarat. And those same trainers or teachers will train the fedayeen, the Iraqi fedayeen, and also the same group of those teachers will train the non-Iraqis, foreigners who are in the camp. Personally, my profession is not this kind of training. My profession is to train people on infantry, typical infantry training, such as training on machine guns, pistols, hand grenades, rocket launchers on the shoulder and this kind of training. The special training that I’m talking about, such as the kidnapping and so, is conducted by those trainers who are not from the army; they are from … al-Mukhabarat.And there was a person who is very famous. They call him Al-Shaba. [ph]. This is Arabic word means “The Ghost,” who was responsible for all the training, and those trainers or the teachers.

Why was he called the Ghost?

I don’t know exactly why he’s being called the Ghost. I came there and his name was the Ghost. But I know that he has conducted several terrorist operations in Lebanon and in other countries all over the world. And I know that he told us that he’s been requested to be arrested by the Interpol. This is probably why he called himself the Ghost.

And the foreign nationals, the Arabs who are there, but who are not Iraqis — what were they like? Were they Egyptians, Saudis? Do you know where they came from?

They look like they’re mostly from the Gulf, sometimes from areas close to Yemen, from their dark skin and short bodies. And they also are Muslims. …

Were they religious?

I don’t know exactly because I saw them seldom very [briefly]. But some of them has beards, long beards, which is an indication of being a religious Muslim. …

How long were you at this base, at this secret location?

Approximately six months.

What was your job?

Administrational things, such as providing food, leave of absence permissions, general training. Ammunition … providing them with ammunition when needed.

How did you meet the Ghost? And what did he say?

I meet him several times a day. We usually meet in the morning when they go to training. We meet in the afternoon or the noontime when they come back from training. And several times, we’ll meet at the evening to drink tea. And he will come, him and other teachers who always with him. They always talk about their operations proudly. For example, they were telling us about how they were able to penetrate the American forces during the 1990 Gulf War, where they went inside the Saudi Arabia territory, and they were able to bring exact coordinates of the Dharan airbase where it was hit by the Scud missiles and many Americans were killed.

He is an Iraqi, the Ghost?

Yes.

Did he explain what kind of training they were giving to the people who were there, especially to the non-Iraqis?

He tried not to talk about training as much as possible. I even, out of curiosity, asked him about those Arabs. Sometime he told me, “Don’t ask about them. This is something we’re not supposed to talk about.”

So the Ghost said, “I can’t talk to you about these Arabs who are training, or what we’re training them in.”

Yes.

So did you find out what kind of training was going on?

I don’t necessarily know what kind of training they do, but they were trained exactly at the same locations, and they were trained by the same teachers who were training … [the fighters for] Saddam. Training includes hijacking and kidnapping of airplanes, trains, public buses, and planting explosives in cities, sabotaging villages, sabotaging houses, assassinations.

And the training also included how to prepare for suicidal operations. For example, they will train them how to belt themselves around with explosives, and jump in a place and explode themselves out as part of the suicidal training. I think the trainings of the Arabs was much harsher, and much stricter, than the training of the Iraqis.

Why?

Because we know that Arabs, non-Iraqis who come to train in these kind of camps, are going to be sent to very dangerous and important operations outside Iraq; not inside Iraq. And they will be conducting very specific operations and dangerous operations in their own cities, or in their own countries, or other countries all over the world. Those Arabs are real volunteers. They come in small numbers, and they come with the intention to do some real suicidal operations. …

There are other types of training, such as physical training, which we are all familiar with. But there’s another kind of special training, which is called “self-confidence training.” … For example, a bunch of the fedayeen will be taken in a helicopter. They will fly them away to an unknown area, and they will be asked to jump out of the plane without knowing if there is underneath them a desert or a house or there’s water. But they’re supposed to jump. So, they will jump.

Another type of self-confidence training would be, for example, they will pull the pin of a hand grenade, and they will throw the hand grenade from one to another until the last one will throw it in the air and it will explode in the air. Another type of self-confidence training would be, they will put a hand grenade in a pipe, and they will pull the pin and throw it in the pipe, and stand near the pipe saluting the hand grenade until it explodes.

Other type of self-confidence training would be holding a rocket launcher, which is an Army GB-7, and holding it vertically, then shooting the rocket vertically, which is very unusual, but the backfire of this hand grenade will hit the ground next to you. And if you don’t have self-confidence, you cannot do it. This is another kind of self-confidence training.

And they trained people to hijack airplanes?

Yes.

For what purpose?

… It has been said openly in the media and even to us, from the highest command, that the purpose of establishing Saddam’s fighters is to attack American targets and American interests. This is known. There’s no doubt about it.

All this training is directed towards attacking American targets, and American interests. The training does not only include hijacking of planes and sabotage. … Some other people were trained to do parachuting. Some other areas were training on how to penetrate enemy lines and get information from behind enemy lines. But it’s all for the general concept of hitting and attacking American targets and American interests.

Who controlled this operation?

In terms of training, they will train in this special camp. But after this training, they will go in small groups. These small groups are directly connected with Saddam, or to Saddam’s son. For example, the Iraqi fighters, they will be spread all over the country. Occasionally those individual groups, very small groups, will be called for. They might encounter different kind of special training beyond this training on specific things. I’ll give you an example. They were calling for some of these groups to train intensively to learn English language, Persian language, Hebrew language, to be sent out to different places of the world to conduct such kind of … different kind of operations. I suspect that the higher level of training, or the additional training they encounter, has a lot to do with what happened. And there’s a lot of similarity with what happened with New York and Washington on September 11.

That was your reaction on September 11 — that some of these people might be involved?

I assure you, this operation was conducted by people who were trained by Saddam. And I’m going to keep assuring the world this is what happened.

Osama bin Laden has no such capabilities. Why? Because this kind of attacks must be, and has to be, organized by a capable state, such as Iraq; a state where they can provide high level of training, and they can provide high level of intelligence to do such training.

How could Osama bin Laden — who’s hiding in the middle of nowhere in Afghanistan in small caves and valleys — train people and gather information and send people to do such high-level operation? We all know this is a high-level operation. This cannot be done by a person who does not even own a plane in Afghanistan, who cannot offer such training in Afghanistan. This is definitely done by a mastermind like Saddam. …

And the camp has a 707 that they train on?

Yes, there’s a real whole 707 plane, a whole real plane, standing in the middle of the training area in this camp.

And they train people on how to get access to the cabin, to the crew?

Yes.

And how to take over the plane using weapons? How?

They will get trained on how to get weapons inside the plane. If there is a security weakness that they know of, they will prefer to get weapons. But I am sure that, before the attack of September 11, those people made a very thorough study. And they learned that getting weapons into the plane might not be a very good idea. But in this camp, I saw them getting trained on this kind of situations where security will not allow you to get weapons into the plane — then what you need to do is to use all available methods and very advanced terrorizing method.

These methods are used to terrorize the passengers and the crew of the plane. They are even trained how to use utensils for food, like forks and knives provided in the plane. … They are trained how to plant horror within the passengers by doing such actions. Even pens and pencils can be used for that purpose they were trained. They can do it, and they can overcome any plane because they are very well physically trained, and they are very strong, and they can do it. They can overtake a plane in a very efficient manner. …

Recently, here in Washington, you met with the FBI.

Yes.

Did you tell them all of this?

Yes.

What was their reaction? Did they say they already knew about this, or did they act like this was all new to them?

No, they do not know about it. But I told them everything I know, hoping that they can make it useful to them. I did that to protect the peace, not only for America; the peace in America and the peace of the world. People must know such training and such preparation for terror is happening in Iraq. Otherwise, it’s going to happen again and again. And it’s up to those people, meaning the FBI, to take action about it. …

Where is the camp located near? You could describe where it’s geographically located.

Yes. It’s southeast of Baghdad, about 25 kilometers from outside of Baghdad … . I think the American government should have pictures of this camp from the air. I know for a fact that on January 1995, the United Nations came and took pictures of this camp. But they don’t know — neither the United Nations nor the American government — what’s going on inside this camp.

But they can see the 707, or the train?

On a Friday, which is equivalent to Sunday here, it’s a holiday, was on January 1995. They came and the United Nations inspectors visited us. They went all the way inside the camp. They saw the plane, they saw the train, and they didn’t care anything about it, because the story was, they told … his commanders told the United Nation, “This is a camp to train police, anti-riots police.”

Anti-riot police?

Yes.

And it really was a terrorist training camp?

Yes.

I can hear someone saying to me, “This is one person claiming that this happened. How are we going to check?” How do we prove or, if you will, test what you have to say?

… If you want to make sure about it, go back to pictures of your government, aerial pictures of your government, and go back all the documents that showed this camp is existing. And go back to my friend who is in Turkey, who could also tell you the same thing that I’m telling you now.

Addition to that, maybe you can find archives of Iraqi TV, showing on the Iraqi TV Saddam’s fighters … putting bombs belted on their bodies, wearing masks. Maybe you should be able to get these archives and see something what’s shown openly on Iraqi TV.

The training of Saddam’s militia was shown on Iraqi TV?

They will show some of their training. For example, they will show clips of their jumping from the helicopters. But there was also parades, military parades, and they will show off Saddam wearing this explosive around themselves with their masks on. … I even heard it on Arabic BBC when they were saying, when they were describing them, not as Saddam’s fighters — they describe them as “the terrorists of Saddam” — wearing explosives and looking like crocodiles, black crocodiles. I’m very surprised that you, in America, don’t know about these things.

To you, then, the likely suspect here is the government of Iraq and Saddam in all this terrorism. And yet we’re looking the wrong way?

I assure you, and I’m going to keep assuring you, that all these things are obvious. I don’t know why you don’t see it. When we were in Iraq, Saddam said all the time, even during the Gulf War, “We will take our revenge at the proper time.” He kept telling the people, “Get ready for our revenge.”

We saw people getting trained to hijack airplanes, to put explosives. How could anybody not think this is not done by Saddam? Even the grouping, those groups were divided into five to six people in the group. How about the training on planes? Some of these groups were taken and trained to drive airplanes at the School of Aviation, northern of Baghdad … .Everything coincides with what’s happening.

In addition to that, we heard in the news about meeting some of those hijackers with the Iraqi intelligence people in Prague, and even getting money to get trained on flying airplanes in the United States from the Iraqi intelligence.

[Did you hear that some of those training at the camp were working for] Osama bin Laden?

Nobody came and told us, “This is Al Qaeda people,” but I know there were some Saudis, there were some Afghanis. There were some other people from other countries getting trained. They didn’t tell us they were part of Al Qaeda; there’s no such thing. … In this camp, we know that those are Saudis, or Arabs are getting trained. Nobody will talk about Al Qaeda or any other organization.

They’re just people.

Yes.

Who clearly wanted to … or were interested in doing terror, becoming terrorists?

This camp is specialized in exporting terrorism to the whole world. …

In the conversations that you had with the Ghost and with others, was it clear that they were involved in international terrorism — that that’s what the object here was, to send people out to do missions?

They all say it. On January 1, 1996, we all met with Saddam personally. And he told us we have to take revenge from America. Our duty is to attack and hit American targets in the Gulf, in the Arab world, and all over the world. He said that openly. When you volunteer to become Saddam’s fighter … they will tell you the purpose of your volunteer[ing] is to attack American targets and American interests, not only in Iraq, not only in the Gulf, [but] all over the world, including Europe and America. That’s how Saddam was able to attract those Arabs and Muslims who came to train, because that’s exactly what they want to do.

I just wanted to understand that in the camp itself, when you were sitting down with the trainers and they were describing what they were doing, did they say they were getting people ready for missions in Europe, in the United States?

Those people who are in the camp … do the training, and the rest will be conducted by the higher command. For example, after you finish the training, there will be groups of five to six people, sometimes four people, but most likely between five to six people, not exceeding six. Maximum number will be six people.

Or they would be able, for example, to call for a specific group for a specific purpose to Baghdad. And nobody knows what this group is going to do. They will go to Baghdad. They will be briefed on what they’re going to do, or trained about something specific. They will be sent, and we don’t know where they go, and they come back to us. That’s how it works. It’s not like the trainers in the camp know what’s going on. The operations are headed directly from the top.

But when someone would hear about an incident, like there was an attack on the U.S. military in Riyadh in Saudi Arabia in 1995, or the Khobar barracks was blown up in Saudi Arabia, you didn’t hear anyone say, “We took part in that,” or, “That was one of ours,” during this period of time.

They don’t talk specifics. The only specific thing they talked about in front of me is … location coordinates during the Gulf War. But I hear them talking about operations in Saudi Arabia, operations other places, in Lebanon. But I never hear the details from them.

Any evidence of biological or chemical warfare training?

This type of training, if it happened, it occurred outside our camp…

Can you explain what’s on this map that you drew?

The surrounding area around this camp is an area for fitness training. This is a Boeing 707, where they trained how to hijack it. And also they were trained how to resist or stop hijacking operation.

Next to it, there’s a double-decker bus in which they could do the same thing — training, hijacking. And this is next to it, there is a village, built houses like a model of a village. They will train how to plant TNT and explosives. And very next to it, there’s a single house, where they’re trained how to enter it, or sabotage it or explode it.

The railway track is where the train is. That’s where they would have the same training for hijacking of a train. I would like to also tell you that this is a village where farmers would live. Those farmers, by the way, are employees by the Iraqi intelligence — all of them. They look like normal families, but they are not as you think. They are employees of the Iraqi intelligence to put cover and protection to the base. …

What’s the method that’s taught, in terms of hijacking? It’s not just taking on weapons, is it?

Training will include the way they would sit in the plane, how they enter the plane, provided they got the right documents from the top levels of Iraqi Intelligence, such as passports. … They will, for example, sit in two’s, and they will assign who will sit to the right of the other guy, and who will sit to the other side. Two will sit in the front, two will sit in the back, and two will sit, for example, in the middle. They are trained to jump all at one time, and make a declaration that “We are going to take over the plane. And nobody [move], don’t move, don’t make any moves.”

They will probably use a pencil or a pen, or even sunglasses or prescription glasses. Somebody will hold the crew members of the plane from their chins upward tightly, and you will pull it on his neck. He will think you are going to slaughter him and kill him. Including in this training is terrorizing by making very, very loud noises and screaming all over the plane. That will take over the planned horror, and will terrorize the plane, including the crew.

Why are you coming forward with this information?

I’d like to tell the whole world, and American people, that I wish peace … in this world. And I want to tell you that what you have seen is very little from what we have seen done to the Iraqi people by Saddam. If somebody use chemical weapons such as in Halabja on his own people, what do you think he would do to different parts of the world? I call for the world and the Iraqi people and every Muslim not to believe the propaganda by Saddam and bin Laden. Those are murderers, and they have nothing to do with Islam.

Here in the United States, as a Muslim, I was never been harassed or treated badly, and nobody stopped me from my prayers, or stopped me from being a Muslim. So what Saddam is doing is exactly what’s against Islam, against the world, and against peace of the world.

Posted by Jimmy B in 19:08:54 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

FISA Fight Continues

FISA Fight Continues
by Jed Babbin

Posted: 01/25/2008

One week from today, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) will expire unless Congress passes a new version that President Bush is willing to sign.  If it expires, our intelligence gatherers here and abroad will be rendered blind and deaf because the legality of their operations will be put in limbo.

As CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden said, terrorists are in a Darwinian era: we’re only capturing the dumb ones.  If we’re going to catch the smart ones — and thwart their plans — we need more and better intelligence.  Why, then, are the Democrats insisting on hobbling intelligence gathering by insisting on a more restrictive FISA?

FISA — which dates back to the Carter administration — is a law that is supposed to govern how intelligence agencies collect data on foreign agents in the United States.  Though the President has Constitutional authority to do this outside of the framework of FISA, President Bush chose last year to submit the National Security Agency’s terrorist surveillance program to FISA limitations when the existence of the highly classified program was leaked to and published by the New York Times.

Last May, the FISA court issued a secret decision that imposed new limitations on gathering foreign intelligence that caused a crisis for NSA, CIA and the other intelligence agencies.  In one reported incident, the new restrictions caused a nine-hour delay in gathering intelligence essential to an ongoing combat mission to rescue three kidnapped American soldiers in Iraq. 

As a result of the FISA court’s action, the Director of National Intelligence, Adm. Mike McConnell, came to the Senate Intelligence committee leaders — Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and Christopher Bond (R-Mo) — in June and asked for urgent action to remedy the problem.

Congress procrastinated until the eve of the August recess when — despite the outcries of the liberal media (the New York Times, again, and others) — it passed a fix to the problem with a six-month sunset provision built in. Democrats were forced to accept the short-term extension because they wouldn’t agree to a provision that would give telecommunications companies immunity from civil lawsuits based on their good-faith cooperation with the government. 

With the expiration date closing in, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) finally began floor action on the FISA bill. But he and the other liberals are trying to wheedle another short-term extension without the telecom immunity the intelligence community wants and needs.  Both McConnells — Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) and Director of National Intelligence Adm. Mike McConnell — have rejected the idea.  Reid, as of last night, seemed ready to play that game out all too long.

Reid’s inability to get agreement among the Dems he supposedly leads frustrated the entire Senate last night.  First, Reid threatened that FISA would be allowed to expire, trying desperately to get a short-term extension. When Minority Leader McConnell blocked the move and filed a cloture motion, Reid was forced to schedule the vote on cloture for Monday afternoon.

Earlier this week, Sen. Bond told me in an interview that, “Congress has had six months to act. To stall legislation needed to help our intelligence community prevent attacks and protect American lives is not only irresponsible, it’s dangerous.”  He added, “Failure to act could leave our country deaf and dumb, handcuffing our intelligence operators who are fighting to protect American families in the war against Islamic extremism.”

The fate of the Senate bill may depend on the New York Times editorial page.

Reid usually defers to the Times’ judgment.  In an August 3 press conference, as the Senate was about to pass the FISA revision, Reid was asked if he thought the Bush administration was stampeding Congress into acting too quickly, Reid literally pulled that day’s lead New York Times editorial on the subject (titled, “Stampeding Congress Again”) and displayed it to the television cameras saying, “Here’s my answer.”  Yesterday’s Senate votes were conducted without that sort of guidance. If the New York Times comes out against the bill again this morning, Reid will probably follow its orders.

The House bill would be a disaster for intelligence agencies.  It would — for the first time in American history — impose a requirement to obtain a FISA court warrant to intercept communications of persons reasonably believed to be overseas.  And (in another blatantly unconstitutional provision) military intelligence gathering would be subjected to FISA court proceedings.

Think about that.  Put yourself in the boots of a SEAL platoon leader trying to determine if you’re walking into an al-Queda ambush.  You probably need — right now, not ten hours from now — intelligence about a bunch of guys sitting two kilometers over some hill in Afghanistan.  If any of them may be in contact with anyone in the United States, you have to get a warrant from the FISA court to listen in on his cell phone. 

It all boils down to this: the House bill will cause the deaths of Americans on the battlefield.  When the Senate bill passes — which is likely Monday afternoon — the House will be left with less than a week to conference its bill with the Senate and agree to a version that the president will sign.

President Bush has indicated he will veto a bill that doesn’t include the telecom immunity provision.  Other aspects of the House bill will also result in a veto.  And if the law expires, much of our intelligence gathering — essential to saving American lives, and not only in combat — will stop. 

Will the Democrats be so cavalier with American lives?  Read the next few days of the New York Times editorials for the answer.

Posted by Jimmy B in 14:36:27 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Saturday, January 26, 2008

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize
December 5, 2001
* Sudan offered up the terrorist and data on his network. The then-president and his advisors didn’t respond.

By MANSOOR IJAZ

President Clinton and his national security team ignored several opportunities to capture Osama bin Laden and his terrorist associates, including one as late as last year.

I know because I negotiated more than one of the opportunities.

From 1996 to 1998, I opened unofficial channels between Sudan and the Clinton administration. I met with officials in both countries, including Clinton, U.S. National Security Advisor Samuel R. “Sandy” Berger and Sudan’s president and intelligence chief. President Omar Hassan Ahmed Bashir, who wanted terrorism sanctions against Sudan lifted, offered the arrest and extradition of Bin Laden and detailed intelligence data about the global networks constructed by Egypt’s Islamic Jihad, Iran’s Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas.

Among those in the networks were the two hijackers who piloted commercial airliners into the World Trade Center.

The silence of the Clinton administration in responding to these offers was deafening.

As an American Muslim and a political supporter of Clinton, I feel now, as I argued with Clinton and Berger then, that their counter-terrorism policies fueled the rise of Bin Laden from an ordinary man to a Hydra-like monster.

Realizing the growing problem with Bin Laden, Bashir sent key intelligence officials to the U.S. in February 1996.

The Sudanese offered to arrest Bin Laden and extradite him to Saudi Arabia or, barring that, to “baby-sit” him–monitoring all his activities and associates.

But Saudi officials didn’t want their home-grown terrorist back where he might plot to overthrow them.

In May 1996, the Sudanese capitulated to U.S. pressure and asked Bin Laden to leave, despite their feeling that he could be monitored better in Sudan than elsewhere.

Bin Laden left for Afghanistan, taking with him Ayman Zawahiri, considered by the U.S. to be the chief planner of the Sept. 11 attacks; Mamdouh Mahmud Salim, who traveled frequently to Germany to obtain electronic equipment for Al Qaeda; Wadih El-Hage, Bin Laden’s personal secretary and roving emissary, now serving a life sentence in the U.S. for his role in the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya; and Fazul Abdullah Mohammed and Saif Adel, also accused of carrying out the embassy attacks.

Some of these men are now among the FBI’s 22 most-wanted terrorists.

The two men who allegedly piloted the planes into the twin towers, Mohamed Atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi, prayed in the same Hamburg mosque as did Salim and Mamoun Darkazanli, a Syrian trader who managed Salim’s bank accounts and whose assets are frozen.

Important data on each had been compiled by the Sudanese.

But U.S. authorities repeatedly turned the data away, first in February 1996; then again that August, when at my suggestion Sudan’s religious ideologue, Hassan Turabi, wrote directly to Clinton; then again in April 1997, when I persuaded Bashir to invite the FBI to come to Sudan and view the data; and finally in February 1998, when Sudan’s intelligence chief, Gutbi al-Mahdi, wrote directly to the FBI.

Gutbi had shown me some of Sudan’s data during a three-hour meeting in Khartoum in October 1996. When I returned to Washington, I told Berger and his specialist for East Africa, Susan Rice, about the data available. They said they’d get back to me. They never did. Neither did they respond when Bashir made the offer directly. I believe they never had any intention to engage Muslim countries–ally or not. Radical Islam, for the administration, was a convenient national security threat.

And that was not the end of it. In July 2000–three months before the deadly attack on the destroyer Cole in Yemen–I brought the White House another plausible offer to deal with Bin Laden, by then known to be involved in the embassy bombings. A senior counter-terrorism official from one of the United States’ closest Arab allies–an ally whose name I am not free to divulge–approached me with the proposal after telling me he was fed up with the antics and arrogance of U.S. counter-terrorism officials.

The offer, which would have brought Bin Laden to the Arab country as the first step of an extradition process that would eventually deliver him to the U.S., required only that Clinton make a state visit there to personally request Bin Laden’s extradition. But senior Clinton officials sabotaged the offer, letting it get caught up in internal politics within the ruling family–Clintonian diplomacy at its best.

Clinton’s failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger’s assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history.

*

Mansoor Ijaz, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, is chairman of a New York-based investment company.

Posted by Jimmy B in 21:26:17 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Democrats Bash Troops

Posted by Jimmy B in 21:13:18 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Bill Clinton Tapes- Monica Lewinsky

Posted by Jimmy B in 20:54:27 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Tribute To Reagan

Posted by Jimmy B in 17:25:08 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

All the President’s women

All the President’s women

Although Paula Jones’s sexual harassment case against the president has collapsed, allegations about Bill Clinton’s private life continue to dog his administration.

Among the women who have made the headlines are:

Kathleen Willey


 

Former White House volunteer Kathleen Willey told CBS’s 60 Minutes that she was groped by the President when she went to ask advice about her financial difficulties. Ms Willey, 51, said he hugged her, touched her breasts, and put her hand on his aroused genitals.

Mr Clinton denied the accusations, but said he hugged her and may have kissed her on the forehead to console her, but insisted the incident was not sexual.

She gave a deposition in 1993 that the President kissed her and asked for sex while the two were in a room next to the Oval office.

Paula Jones


 

Mrs Jones is a former Arkansas state clerk who alleged that when Mr Clinton was governor of Arkansas in 1991, she was summoned to his room at the Excelsior Hotel in Little Rock, by a state trooper.

She has said he then dropped then his trousers and, alluding to his genitals, asked her to “kiss it.” She claims that she refused his offer and was then told to keep quiet about the incident. She said that she was later demoted at work as a result. Mrs Jones filed a formal complaint against President Clinton in May 1994 alleging sexual harassment and defamation of character but in April 1998, the case was thrown out.

Federal Judge Susan Webber Wright dismissed Paula Jones’s case against the president, saying that her lawyers had failed to provide enough evidence to prove it could win at trial.

Monica Lewinsky


 

This 23-year-old former White House aide is the youngest of the President’s women to emerge. Paula Jones’s lawyers discovered her after they spoke to a number of his female aides, in the hope of establishing a pattern of sexual behaviour.

Ms Lewinsky was an unpaid intern when it is alleged that the President first took an interest in her. It is claimed the two had an affair which lasted a year and that they had sex in the White House. When Ms Lewinsky first arrived in Washington she worked in the office of the Chief of Staff and later ended up in 1997 as secretary to the Defense Department Spokesman, Kenneth Bacon.

After leaving the White House she worked at the Pentagon. It is reported that she got her latest job at the Revlon Corporation after being recommended to the company by Vernon Jordan, a close friend of Mr Clinton’s. Until last year she lived at the Watergate apartment building in Washington - the same building where a break-in more than 20 years ago led to the downfall of President Nixon.

Gennifer Flowers


 

Ms Flowers is a former nightclub singer who became the focus of attention during Mr Clinton’s 1992 election campaign. She alleged at the time that the she had an affair with Bill Clinton for 12 years while he was governor of Arkansas.

She sold tapes of their telephone conversations and said that he offered her a job in local government in exchange for sexual favours. These accusations prompted Mr and Mrs Clinton to admit on national television that they had experienced problems in their marriage.


Others include:

Elizabeth Ward Gracen, 37 a former Miss America, told the New York Daily News on March 31 1998 that she had had consensual sex with Mr Clinton in 1982. Her statement followed allegations that the President, then Governor of Arkansas, had forced her to have sex with him.

Sally Perdue, a former Miss Arkansas, who has alleged that she had a sexual relationship with Mr Clinton in 1983. She said that the Arkansas state troopers used to escort him to her house and then wait outside while the two were meeting.

Finally Dolly Kyle Browning, an old friend of Mr Clinton’s from Arkansas has also said she had an affair with him. She claims he tried to start up another relationship with her in 1994.

Posted by Jimmy B in 16:31:37 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Interrogator: Invasion Surprised Saddam

Interrogator: Invasion Surprised Saddam

Jan. 24, 2008


(CBS) Saddam Hussein initially didn’t think the U.S. would invade Iraq to destroy weapons of mass destruction, so he kept the fact that he had none a secret to prevent an Iranian invasion he believed could happen. The Iraqi dictator revealed this thinking to George Piro, the FBI agent assigned to interrogate him after his capture.

Piro, in his first television interview, relays this and other revelations to 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley this Sunday, Jan. 27, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.

Piro spent almost seven months debriefing Saddam in a plan based on winning his confidence by convincing him that Piro was an important envoy who answered to President Bush. This and being Saddam’s sole provider of items like writing materials and toiletries made the toppled Iraqi president open up to Piro, a Lebanese-American and one of the few FBI agents who spoke Arabic.

“He told me he initially miscalculated… President Bush’s intentions. He thought the United States would retaliate with the same type of attack as we did in 1998…a four-day aerial attack,” says Piro. “He survived that one and he was willing to accept that type of attack.” “He didn’t believe the U.S. would invade?” asks Pelley, “No, not initially,” answers Piro.

Once the invasion was certain, says Piro, Saddam asked his generals if they could hold the invaders for two weeks. “And at that point, it would go into what he called the secret war,” Piro tells Pelley. But Piro isn’t convinced that the insurgency was Saddam’s plan. “Well, he would like to take credit for the insurgency,” says Piro.

Saddam still wouldn’t admit he had no weapons of mass destruction, even when it was obvious there would be military action against him because of the perception he did. Because, says Piro, “For him, it was critical that he was seen as still the strong, defiant Saddam. He thought that [faking having the weapons] would prevent the Iranians from reinvading Iraq,” he tells Pelley.

He also intended and had the wherewithal to restart the weapons program. “Saddam] still had the engineers. The folks that he needed to reconstitute his program are still there,” says Piro. “He wanted to pursue all of WMD…to reconstitute his entire WMD program.” This included chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, Piro says.

Saddam bragged that he changed his routine and security to elude capture. “What he wanted to really illustrate is…how he was able to outsmart us,” says Piro. “He told me he changed…the way he traveled. He got rid of his normal vehicles. He got rid of the protective detail that he traveled with, really just to change his signature.”

It took nine months to finally capture Saddam, but U.S. calculations on where he might be early on turned out to be accurate. Saddam was at Dora Farms early in the war when the known presidential site was targeted with tons of bombs and many missiles. “He said it in a kind of a bragging fashion that he was there, but that we missed him. He wasn’t bothered by the fact that he was there,” Piro tells Pelley.”

My Take;

“He told me he initially miscalculated… President Bush’s intentions. He thought the United States would retaliate with the same type of attack as we did in 1998…a four-day aerial attack,” says Piro. “He survived that one and he was willing to accept that type of attack.” “He didn’t believe the U.S. would invade?” asks Pelley, “No, not initially,” answers Piro

So basically he was planning to keep thumbing his nose at us and the UN and restart the WMD program because he thought we would only bomb him. He forgot Slick Willy was out of office image


He made a fatal mistake and he and his sons paid for it with their miserable murderous lives. Nice image

Posted by Jimmy B in 15:48:55 | Permalink | Comments (1) »